Slither Championship #2

roro, please post your predictions

Just for reference, RoRoRo doesn't read the fora, so won't see this thread.
Also note that to prevent forum spam, not everyone can request predictions to the fora. However, anyone can ask for preditions to be sent by private message.

I've recently simplified his interface (hence all the predictions starting today, as I debugged that new interface) - I'll update his documentation, and start the predictions manually.

Thanks for taking an interest!

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
I've been requested to follow slither.ch.2.1.1 by FatPhil

For info on how these predictions are calculated see my predictions web page .
\* Already completed matches:

Games completed: 4/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | mungo | (1689) | -| _ _ 2 _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 8.23% | 1.23% | 30.12% |
| 2 | kyle douglas | (1800)| _ | -| _ _ _ _ _ 2 _ | 2 | 0 | 17.15% | 1.76% | 18.83% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1851)| _ _ | -| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | 2 | 0 | 29.66% | 2.28% | 10.34% |
| 4 | LEESD | (1874)| 0 _ _ | -| _ _ _ 2 _ | 2 | 0 | 18.29% | 2.09% | 15.62% |
| 5 | bennok | (1675)| _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ _ _ | 0 | 0 | 2.61% | 0.51% | 62.46% |
| 6 | eaeaeapepe | (1692)| _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ _ | 0 | 0 | 3.39% | 0.66% | 57.51% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1797)| _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 15.36% | 1.65% | 24.28% |
| 8 | z | (1505)| _ 0 0 0 _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.87% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1608)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.65% | 0.19% | 81.97% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* z 0 - 2 bennok

Games completed: 5/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | mungo | (1689) | -| _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 7.89% | 1.21% | 30.73% |
| 2 | bennok | (1683)| _ | -| _ _ _ _ _ *2 _ | 2 | 0 | 3.42% | 0.70% | 53.63% |
| 3 | kyle douglas | (1792)| _ _ | -| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | 2 | 0 | 15.45% | 1.74% | 21.80% |
| 4 | 5466 | (1864)| _ _ _ | -| _ _ _ 2 _ | 2 | 0 | 33.74% | 2.48% | 9.37% |
| 5 | LEESD | (1874)| 0 _ _ _ | -| _ _ 2 _ | 2 | 0 | 17.94% | 2.27% | 16.50% |
| 6 | eaeaeapepe | (1693)| _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ _ | 0 | 0 | 3.53% | 0.63% | 57.13% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 12.51% | 1.53% | 29.03% |
| 8 | z | (1497)| _ *0 0 0 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.71% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1608)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.69% | 0.19% | 82.11% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* z 2 - 0 Arty Sandler

Games completed: 6/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | bennok | (1683) | -| _ _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 3.56% | 0.61% | 51.03% |
| 2 | kyle douglas | (1792)| _ | -| _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 15.72% | 1.76% | 20.11% |
| 3 | mungo | (1689)| _ _ | -| _ 2 _ _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 8.08% | 1.21% | 29.76% |
| 4 | 5466 | (1864)| _ _ _ | -| _ 2 _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 34.13% | 2.31% | 8.61% |
| 5 | LEESD | (1874)| _ _ 0 _ | -| 2 _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 17.100% | 2.09% | 15.53% |
| 6 | z | (1517)| 0 0 _ 0 0 | -| _ _ *2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.98% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1693)| _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 3.21% | 0.64% | 56.77% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 12.51% | 1.45% | 28.21% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1588)| _ _ _ _ _ *0 _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.25% | 0.03% | 90.100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* eaeaeapepe 0 - 2 z <--- upset!

Games completed: 7/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | z | (1540) | -| 0 0 0 0 _ *2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94.98% |
| 2 | bennok | (1683)| 2 | -| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 3.71% | 0.67% | 47.51% |
| 3 | kyle douglas | (1792)| 2 _ | -| _ _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 16.66% | 1.65% | 17.44% |
| 4 | 5466 | (1864)| 2 _ _ | -| _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 35.10% | 2.28% | 7.09% |
| 5 | LEESD | (1874)| 2 _ _ _ | -| 0 _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 18.18% | 2.12% | 12.91% |
| 6 | mungo | (1689)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 4 | 8.30% | 1.11% | 28.25% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| *0 _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 1.02% | 0.17% | 74.99% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 12.58% | 1.50% | 25.90% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1588)| 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.15% | 0.04% | 90.94% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* mungo 2 - 0 z

Games completed: 8/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | mungo | (1698) | -| *2 _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ | 4 | 12 | 11.12% | 1.39% | 18.33% |
| 2 | z | (1531)| *0 | -| 0 0 0 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.46% |
| 3 | bennok | (1683)| _ 2 | -| _ _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 3.67% | 0.65% | 49.17% |
| 4 | kyle douglas | (1792)| _ 2 _ | -| _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 15.88% | 1.67% | 18.62% |
| 5 | 5466 | (1864)| _ 2 _ _ | -| _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 34.50% | 2.45% | 7.59% |
| 6 | LEESD | (1874)| 0 2 _ _ _ | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 17.02% | 2.04% | 14.66% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ 0 _ _ _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 1.08% | 0.13% | 75.13% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 12.07% | 1.48% | 26.17% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1588)| _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.20% | 0.03% | 90.86% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Arty Sandler 0 - 2 LEESD

Games completed: 9/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | mungo | (1698) | -| 2 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 10.54% | 1.43% | 18.17% |
| 2 | LEESD | (1879)| 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ _ *2 | 4 | 8 | 19.12% | 2.28% | 10.19% |
| 3 | z | (1531)| 0 0 | -| 0 0 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.53% |
| 4 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 3.44% | 0.60% | 50.22% |
| 5 | kyle douglas | (1793)| _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 15.44% | 1.77% | 18.52% |
| 6 | 5466 | (1868)| _ _ 2 _ _ | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 33.95% | 2.45% | 7.50% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ 0 _ _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 0.99% | 0.15% | 75.18% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 11.86% | 1.52% | 26.52% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1583)| _ *0 0 _ _ _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.05% | 0.01% | 94.18% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* kyle douglas 2 - 0 LEESD

Games completed: 10/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1812) | -| _ *2 2 _ _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 33.40% | 2.30% | 4.77% |
| 2 | mungo | (1678)| _ | -| 2 2 _ _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 8.00% | 1.14% | 23.05% |
| 3 | LEESD | (1860)| *0 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ 2 | 4 | 8 | 3.17% | 1.23% | 23.16% |
| 4 | z | (1531)| 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.49% |
| 5 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 3.33% | 0.61% | 49.22% |
| 6 | 5466 | (1873)| _ _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 35.52% | 2.34% | 6.69% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 1.02% | 0.14% | 74.36% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 11.42% | 1.30% | 25.33% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1583)| _ _ 0 0 _ _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.07% | 0.01% | 93.92% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* mungo 0 - 2 5466

Games completed: 11/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1812) | -| _ _ 2 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 30.56% | 2.12% | 4.39% |
| 2 | mungo | (1671)| _ | -| *0 2 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 2.57% | 0.69% | 29.93% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1885)| _ *2 | -| _ 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 45.55% | 2.23% | 2.67% |
| 4 | LEESD | (1860)| 0 0 _ | -| 2 _ _ _ 2 | 4 | 8 | 3.12% | 1.20% | 22.55% |
| 5 | z | (1531)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.39% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 3.06% | 0.44% | 49.19% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ _ _ 0 _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 0.89% | 0.10% | 73.53% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 10.59% | 1.15% | 24.83% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1583)| _ _ _ 0 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.06% | 0.02% | 93.52% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* mungo 0 - 2 kyle douglas

Games completed: 12/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1821) | -| *2 _ 2 2 _ _ _ _ | 6 | 24 | 38.36% | 2.09% | 1.22% |
| 2 | mungo | (1662)| *0 | -| 0 2 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 0.20% | 0.13% | 40.19% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1885)| _ 2 | -| _ 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 42.25% | 1.90% | 2.55% |
| 4 | LEESD | (1860)| 0 0 _ | -| 2 _ _ _ 2 | 4 | 8 | 2.71% | 1.15% | 20.38% |
| 5 | z | (1531)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.13% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 2.71% | 0.50% | 47.14% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ _ _ 0 _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 0.77% | 0.10% | 72.35% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 9.80% | 1.06% | 23.99% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1583)| _ _ _ 0 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.06% | 0.02% | 93.03% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* kyle douglas 2 - 0 Arty Sandler

Games completed: 13/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1830) | -| 2 _ 2 2 _ _ _ *2 | 8 | 24 | 42.72% | 2.23% | 0.60% |
| 2 | mungo | (1662)| 0 | -| 0 2 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 0.15% | 0.11% | 38.84% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1892)| _ 2 | -| _ 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 40.27% | 1.94% | 2.27% |
| 4 | LEESD | (1873)| 0 0 _ | -| 2 _ _ _ 2 | 4 | 8 | 2.10% | 1.17% | 18.42% |
| 5 | z | (1531)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.18% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 2.26% | 0.39% | 47.21% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ _ _ 0 _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 0.65% | 0.06% | 73.19% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 8.72% | 1.15% | 23.79% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1577)| *0 _ _ 0 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.50% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* 5466 0 - 2 LEESD

Games completed: 14/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1830) | -| 2 2 _ 2 _ _ _ 2 | 8 | 28 | 52.38% | 3.29% | 0.63% |
| 2 | LEESD | (1905)| 0 | -| 0 *2 2 _ _ _ 2 | 6 | 16 | 5.41% | 2.85% | 4.16% |
| 3 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 | -| 0 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 20 | 0.24% | 0.16% | 40.82% |
| 4 | 5466 | (1869)| _ *0 2 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 23.85% | 2.35% | 5.85% |
| 5 | z | (1531)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 2 _ 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.54% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 2.67% | 0.53% | 50.95% |
| 7 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ _ _ 0 _ | -| _ _ | 0 | 0 | 0.82% | 0.09% | 75.05% |
| 8 | Ray Garrison | (1781)| _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 9.78% | 1.31% | 26.10% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1577)| 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 96.90% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Ray Garrison 2 - 0 z

Games completed: 15/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1830) | -| 2 2 _ 2 _ _ _ 2 | 8 | 28 | 50.73% | 3.36% | 0.73% |
| 2 | LEESD | (1905)| 0 | -| 0 2 2 _ _ _ 2 | 6 | 16 | 5.08% | 2.93% | 4.47% |
| 3 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 | -| 0 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 20 | 0.24% | 0.19% | 42.09% |
| 4 | 5466 | (1874)| _ 0 2 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 16 | 23.95% | 2.39% | 6.02% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 *0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 2.64% | 0.54% | 52.05% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ _ _ _ *2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 11.61% | 1.41% | 21.63% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1670)| _ _ _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0.77% | 0.09% | 75.95% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1577)| 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 97.06% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* LEESD 2 - 0 eaeaeapepe
\* 5466 2 - 0 Arty Sandler

Games completed: 17/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1830) | -| 2 _ 2 2 _ _ _ 2 | 8 | 32 | 47.91% | 3.59% | 0.61% |
| 2 | LEESD | (1911)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 _ _ *2 2 | 8 | 20 | 6.52% | 3.50% | 1.93% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1881)| _ 0 | -| 2 2 _ _ _ *2 | 6 | 16 | 26.59% | 2.61% | 3.75% |
| 4 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 24 | 0.18% | 0.23% | 40.21% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 2.37% | 0.62% | 51.12% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 10.71% | 1.58% | 20.81% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1664)| _ *0 _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0.21% | 0.03% | 83.10% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 *0 _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.48% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* 5466 0 - 2 kyle douglas

Games completed: 18/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1862) | -| 2 *2 2 2 _ _ _ 2 | 10 | 44 | 83.18% | 2.12% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1911)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 _ _ 2 2 | 8 | 20 | 2.12% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1823)| *0 0 | -| 2 2 _ _ _ 2 | 6 | 16 | 0.22% | 0.22% | 11.87% |
| 4 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 24 | 0.10% | 0.07% | 37.78% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.99% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 1.92% | 0.31% | 49.22% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 9.86% | 0.97% | 19.37% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1664)| _ 0 _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0.19% | 0.02% | 81.25% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 0 _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.48% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* eaeaeapepe 0 - 2 kyle douglas

Games completed: 19/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 2 2 _ _ *2 2 | 12 | 44 | 86.64% | 1.24% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1911)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 _ _ 2 2 | 8 | 20 | 0.93% | 1.01% | 1.97% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1823)| 0 0 | -| 2 2 _ _ _ 2 | 6 | 16 | 0.02% | 0.18% | 10.46% |
| 4 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 24 | 0.02% | 0.06% | 34.44% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.99% |
| 6 | bennok | (1683)| _ _ _ _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 1.80% | 0.28% | 47.57% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 9.06% | 0.63% | 17.54% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1647)| *0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89.67% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 0 _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.36% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* 5466 2 - 0 bennok

Games completed: 20/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 2 2 _ _ 2 2 | 12 | 48 | 88.17% | 1.33% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1911)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 _ _ 2 2 | 8 | 24 | 0.84% | 0.88% | 1.57% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1832)| 0 0 | -| 2 2 *2 _ _ 2 | 8 | 20 | 0.02% | 0.28% | 2.54% |
| 4 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 24 | 0.00% | 0.02% | 32.13% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.98% |
| 6 | bennok | (1674)| _ _ *0 _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 0.59% | 0.16% | 59.60% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 8.88% | 0.67% | 16.65% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1647)| 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89.34% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 0 _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.19% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* bennok 0 - 2 LEESD

Games completed: 21/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 2 2 _ _ 2 2 | 12 | 52 | 88.87% | 1.31% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1917)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 *2 _ 2 2 | 10 | 28 | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.01% |
| 3 | 5466 | (1834)| 0 0 | -| 2 2 2 _ _ 2 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0.12% | 2.29% |
| 4 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 28 | 0 | 0.01% | 28.24% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.99% |
| 6 | bennok | (1668)| _ *0 0 _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 0.05% | 0.10% | 67.41% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ _ _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 8.58% | 0.58% | 15.37% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1647)| 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88.83% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 0 _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.86% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* LEESD 2 - 0 Ray Garrison

Games completed: 22/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 2 2 _ _ 2 2 | 12 | 56 | 92.99% | 1.65% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1927)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 2 *2 2 2 | 12 | 32 | 1.63% | 1.73% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | (1852)| 0 0 | -| 2 2 2 _ _ 2 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1.86% |
| 4 | mungo | (1662)| 0 2 0 | -| 2 _ _ _ _ | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0.00% | 26.30% |
| 5 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.98% |
| 6 | bennok | (1678)| _ 0 0 _ 2 | -| _ _ _ | 2 | 8 | 0.01% | 0.03% | 62.58% |
| 7 | Ray Garrison | (1777)| _ *0 _ _ 2 _ | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 3.53% | 0.53% | 22.35% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1647)| 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 89.09% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 0 _ 0 _ _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.83% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Ray Garrison 2 - 0 eaeaeapepe

Games completed: 23/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 2 _ 2 _ 2 2 | 12 | 56 | 90.55% | 1.85% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1927)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 | 12 | 36 | 2.06% | 1.89% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | (1852)| 0 0 | -| 2 _ 2 2 _ 2 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1.40% |
| 4 | mungo | (1674)| 0 2 0 | -| _ 2 _ _ _ | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0.01% | 25.81% |
| 5 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ 0 _ _ | -| 2 _ *2 _ | 4 | 8 | 5.33% | 0.62% | 14.48% |
| 6 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 0 | -| 0 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7 | bennok | (1690)| _ 0 0 _ _ 2 | -| _ _ | 2 | 8 | 0.01% | 0.05% | 63.95% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1637)| 0 0 _ _ *0 0 _ | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.38% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1573)| 0 0 0 _ _ 0 _ _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.99% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

Oh I still have the shadow of a chance :)

That's the attitude - be positive!

I'm wondering, have the top players encountered any particularly interesting games this championship, ones that would be instructive as a "LittleGolem TV" video on youtube?

I found my game against LEESD was quite entertaining. Also, it was 100+ moves.

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* bennok 2 - 0 Arty Sandler

Games completed: 24/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 2 _ _ 2 2 2 | 12 | 56 | 89.64% | 1.97% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1927)| 0 | -| 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 | 12 | 40 | 2.70% | 2.17% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | (1852)| 0 0 | -| 2 2 _ 2 _ 2 | 8 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1.87% |
| 4 | mungo | (1674)| 0 2 0 | -| _ _ 2 _ _ | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0.01% | 29.98% |
| 5 | bennok | (1700)| _ 0 0 _ | -| _ 2 _ *2 | 4 | 8 | 0.01% | 0.08% | 53.89% |
| 6 | Ray Garrison | (1787)| _ 0 _ _ _ | -| 2 2 _ | 4 | 8 | 5.42% | 0.57% | 18.39% |
| 7 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 0 0 | -| 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1651)| 0 0 _ _ _ 0 0 | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.15% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1563)| 0 0 0 _ *0 _ 0 _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.72% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Arty Sandler 0 - 2 Ray Garrison

Games completed: 25/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 _ 2 _ 2 2 2 | 12 | 56 | 87.65% | 2.08% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1927)| 0 | -| 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 | 12 | 44 | 3.10% | 2.21% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | (1852)| 0 0 | -| _ 2 2 2 _ 2 | 8 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2.16% |
| 4 | Ray Garrison | (1793)| _ 0 _ | -| _ _ 2 2 *2 | 6 | 8 | 6.93% | 0.73% | 12.73% |
| 5 | mungo | (1674)| 0 2 0 _ | -| _ 2 _ _ | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0.02% | 31.38% |
| 6 | bennok | (1700)| _ 0 0 _ _ | -| 2 _ 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.01% | 0.08% | 57.57% |
| 7 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 0 0 | -| 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1651)| 0 0 _ 0 _ _ 0 | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.16% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1557)| 0 0 0 *0 _ 0 0 _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

Top seed versus (probable) winner is a good candidate for being a decisive game in the tournament - it would be great if someone would make a commentary. I didn't understand half of the moves, and felt like some were just plain wrong (because I'm so stupid!) - so there's definitely plenty of material to learn from in that game, I'm 100% sure.

Volunteers?

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* bennok 2 - 0 eaeaeapepe

Games completed: 26/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | (1869) | -| 2 2 _ _ 2 2 2 2 | 12 | 56 | 86.64% | 2.17% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | (1931)| 0 | -| 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 | 12 | 48 | 4.10% | 2.52% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | (1860)| 0 0 | -| 2 _ 2 2 _ 2 | 8 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 1.36% |
| 4 | bennok | (1713)| _ 0 0 | -| _ _ 2 *2 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.02% | 0.21% | 43.62% |
| 5 | Ray Garrison | (1793)| _ 0 _ _ | -| _ 2 2 2 | 6 | 8 | 6.67% | 0.71% | 17.98% |
| 6 | mungo | (1674)| 0 2 0 _ _ | -| 2 _ _ | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0.05% | 37.05% |
| 7 | z | (1525)| 0 0 0 0 0 0 | -| 2 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | (1638)| 0 0 _ *0 0 _ 0 | -| _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | (1557)| 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* kyle douglas 0 - 2 bennok

Games completed: 27/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1847 | - | 2 | *0 | 2 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 56 | 67.04% | 8.05% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1931 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 52 | 16.11% | 9.65% | 0 |
| 3 | bennok | 1735 | *2 | 0 | - | 0 | _ | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0.14% | 0.90% | 17.32% |
| 4 | 5466 | 1840 | 0 | 0 | 2 | - | _ | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5.37% |
| 5 | Ray Garrison | 1793 | _ | 0 | _ | _ | - | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 6.86% | 3.07% | 23.75% |
| 6 | mungo | 1674 | 0 | 2 | _ | 0 | _ | - | 2 | _ | _ | 4 | 32 | 0 | 0.20% | 53.56% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1638 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | _ | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1557 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Arty Sandler 0 - 2 mungo

Games completed: 28/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1847 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 60 | 69.98% | 8.40% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1931 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 52 | 12.50% | 9.43% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | 1828 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | _ | 2 | 8 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 6.20% |
| 4 | bennok | 1735 | 2 | 0 | 0 | - | _ | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0.25% | 1.29% | 21.40% |
| 5 | mungo | 1684 | 0 | 2 | 0 | _ | - | _ | 2 | _ | *2 | 6 | 32 | 0 | 0.42% | 40.45% |
| 6 | Ray Garrison | 1793 | _ | 0 | _ | _ | _ | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 7.41% | 3.46% | 31.95% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1630 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | *0 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

In the evening shadows grow larger...

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* eaeaeapepe 0 - 2 5466

Games completed: 29/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1847 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 64 | 70.61% | 8.10% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1931 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 56 | 13.18% | 9.08% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | 1830 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | *2 | 2 | 10 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3.02% |
| 4 | bennok | 1735 | 2 | 0 | 0 | - | _ | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 0.91% | 21.95% |
| 5 | mungo | 1681 | 0 | 2 | 0 | _ | - | _ | 2 | _ | 2 | 6 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 42.23% |
| 6 | Ray Garrison | 1793 | _ | 0 | _ | _ | _ | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 7.13% | 3.48% | 32.81% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1623 | 0 | 0 | *0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

It will be remembered that "eaeaeapepe-5466" was the one crucial game when I lost my potential title of LG champion in the game of Slither :)
May the best one win and good luck to the ones who need it!
(I know : strictly speaking there is no luck involved in this game.)

There is always next time!

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* mungo 2 - 0 bennok

Games completed: 30/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1850 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 83.22% | 8.83% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1935 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 56 | 1.59% | 8.83% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | 1867 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 3.45% |
| 4 | mungo | 1699 | 0 | 2 | 0 | - | *2 | _ | 2 | _ | 2 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 6.37% |
| 5 | bennok | 1717 | 2 | 0 | 0 | *0 | - | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 52.87% |
| 6 | Ray Garrison | 1793 | _ | 0 | _ | _ | _ | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 6.35% | 2.53% | 37.31% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1623 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* bennok 0 - 2 Ray Garrison

Games completed: 31/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1850 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 82.22% | 6.85% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1952 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 6.85% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | 1883 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | mungo | 1699 | 0 | 2 | 0 | - | 2 | _ | 2 | _ | 2 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | bennok | 1690 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | *0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 87.78% |
| 6 | Ray Garrison | 1804 | _ | 0 | _ | _ | *2 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 10.92% | 0 | 12.22% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1623 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* kyle douglas 0 - 2 Ray Garrison

Games completed: 32/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1832 | - | 2 | *0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 57.05% | 15.51% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1952 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 64 | 0 | 15.51% | 0 |
| 3 | Ray Garrison | 1822 | *2 | 0 | - | _ | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 48 | 27.45% | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 5466 | 1883 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | mungo | 1699 | 0 | 2 | _ | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | bennok | 1690 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1623 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

My goodness, it gets tense...

Interesting how I have chances to tie or win, while the other two players have either only a chance of winning, or only a chance of drawing.

Yeah, Ray's the all-or-nothing guy, and LEESD's scratching around for leftovers...
I see there's more than one way how 4 people can share 12 points at the top.

Any particularly interesting games? A pedagogical game would be very useful for all us noobs. (Yes, I'm thinking LGTV on youtube again.)

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Ray Garrison 0 - 2 5466

Games completed: 33/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1832 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 72 | 74.32% | 25.68% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1952 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 0 | 25.68% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | 1908 | 0 | 0 | - | *2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Ray Garrison | 1810 | 2 | 0 | *0 | - | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | mungo | 1699 | 0 | 2 | 0 | _ | - | 2 | 2 | _ | 2 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | bennok | 1690 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1623 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1547 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

So Kyle is the champion, and LEESD can tie (if I beat Mungo)...congrats Kyle!

For a tie I have to lose against eaeaeapepe also...

Two losses.... No, I hope Kyle wins

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Arty Sandler 2 - 0 eaeaeapepe

Games completed: 34/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1832 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 76 | 75.93% | 24.07% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1952 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 72 | 0 | 24.07% | 0 |
| 3 | 5466 | 1908 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Ray Garrison | 1810 | 2 | 0 | 0 | - | _ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | mungo | 1699 | 0 | 2 | 0 | _ | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | _ | 8 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | bennok | 1690 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | Arty Sandler | 1566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | *2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | eaeaeapepe | 1604 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | *0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* Ray Garrison 2 - 0 mungo

Games completed: 35/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1845 | - | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 76 | 61.89% | 38.11% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1952 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 76 | 0 | 38.11% | 0 |
| 3 | Ray Garrison | 1821 | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | *2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 5466 | 1913 | 0 | 0 | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | mungo | 1688 | 0 | 2 | *0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | _ | 8 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | bennok | 1704 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | Arty Sandler | 1566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | eaeaeapepe | 1604 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | _ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

I lost both... :(
So, congratulations to kyle and LEESD!

*Tournament: slither.ch.2.1.1
Newly completed matches:
\* eaeaeapepe 2 - 0 mungo

Games completed: 36/36
table{background:#ffe700;border:1}.
{background:#ff8000}. |_. N |_. Player |_. Rating |_. 1 |_. 2 |_. 3 |_. 4 |_. 5 |_. 6 |_. 7 |_. 8 |_. 9 |_. Score |_. Son |_. p(win) |_. p(draw) |_. p(down) |
| 1 | kyle douglas | 1845 | - | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 80 | 0 | 100% | 0 |
| 2 | LEESD | 1952 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 80 | 0 | 100% | 0 |
| 3 | Ray Garrison | 1821 | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 5466 | 1916 | 0 | 0 | 2 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | mungo | 1669 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | *0 | 2 | 8 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | bennok | 1704 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 7 | z | 1525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 8 | eaeaeapepe | 1623 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | *2 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| 9 | Arty Sandler | 1566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | - | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100% |

p(down) is the probability of being in the places 6-9 and thus being demoted

Thanks for the great tournament!

That's close - 4 share the top score of 12 points. Only the rewards-success-but-doesn't-punish-failure tie-breaker separates you lot into pairs.

I can't propose anything better off the top of my head, but I become less of a fan of SoN over time. I notice that some techniques used for selection of candidates in democratic elections would put Kyle as the sole winner.

So who would like to volunteer to do a commentary of one of the better games (such as Kyle vs. LEESD, as I suggested a month or so back)?