Skip to content
Little GolemMake your next move.

Game 1789619 Arek vs Maciej

Public forum discussion.

#1 · Bill LeBoeuf

12 Sep 2016

I really enjoyed following this game.  Many of the moves are not obvious.  I was surprised it ended when it did as it still seemed quite complicated.

I would be appreciative if you all would care to comment on your game.

#2 · lazyplayer

12 Sep 2016

Bill, i was chatting with Arek about it... he wanted to analyze black I4 instead of black L4...

On bottom left It is very confusing mess because of b10 and d12, and we also agreed that d12 seems crazy...

#3 · Bill LeBoeuf

13 Sep 2016

Yes, I also wondered about L4.

With D12 , I even wondered if Maciej were making a Joke: "if you can play B10, then I can play D12 :)

#4 · tasuki

22 Sep 2016

An exciting game, I'd also appreciate a commentary!

I don't see how the end position is a win for white. The sequence I see: black c8, white b9, black c9 ... what then?

  1. if white e7, then black c7
  2. if white c7, then black e7

Actually, I'd really enjoy any commented games by the top players!

#7 · lazyplayer

30 Sep 2016

I also think E4 is illogical and presumably wrong, but maybe J9 is not the best attempt at refutation...

H6 i used to think was too weak on right side, but after playing black, i think it is an interesting try for white.

#8 · Arek Kulczycki

2 Oct 2016

Ok so the basis of both those games is an opening that I came up with, let's call it Arek's opening... ;)

In truth I don't know yet if this is a valid opening because I've lost a couple of games doing it outwardly correct way. However, there are positive signs that maybe I just blunder middle games.

It is a way to play against m1/a13 and starts with: Arek's opening .

The idea for black is to follow with moves c4, g4 and b10 in an order that depends on white's play.

Each corner joseki is to be figured out by the player each game. For example I think I played wrong in the mentioned game against lazyplayer. Probably the correct way was: correctway? .

I doubt i6 should be addressed immediately - i5 and h7 should not be played. Another thing that I have discarded in the past is
stuffkilledbyL8 because black L8 later is way too strong. An option that I like and have not discarded yet is whatanonsensetry , someone interested could try and explore it.

#9 · Arek Kulczycki

2 Oct 2016

Oh, this site awkwardly inserted way more links than I put into the editor. Sorry for the mess.

#10 · lazyplayer

2 Oct 2016

Arek, it's impossible to understand many of the things that you were trying to say...

Anyway, i think I6 is just a poor try, take a look at J5, it should be a relatively "clean" refutation of "your" opening...

There can be many variations but the key should be this

#11 · lazyplayer

2 Oct 2016

The "idea" i had when i played I6 is that all simpler moves "clearly" lose, and i had to play a "magic" move that does a little bit of everything... but i would say, i had missed the potential of J5 to do something good and to do it without going into hard positions...

#12 · lazyplayer

2 Oct 2016

Maciej's way of playing it is also very "clean", and he goes directly for what I've called the "key" plan. I think probably it's as good as my J5 proposal.

#13 · lazyplayer

2 Oct 2016

Game with Maciej was all simple and sensible until he went into confusing territory with his D12...

But I've failed to come up with sensible plan against B10, so i don't feel confident to suggest alternatives...

#14 · lazyplayer

2 Oct 2016

Shalev's try is also interesting and very simple. Indeed it's surely the simplest.

#18 · Arek Kulczycki

5 Oct 2016

Indeed I think 5.j5 is a losing move

while 5.i6 I don't have opinion