Skip to content
Little GolemMake your next move.

game 1651322 Shalev-Maciej

Public forum discussion.

#1 · Bill LeBoeuf

23 Dec 2014

Shalev, I thought move 37 was brilliant, I missed it and it looks to me like the winning move that perhaps Maciej missed too.  At any rate he went into vacation time over it. :)

#3 · Bill LeBoeuf

23 Dec 2014

So how does he respond to 43. i6 rather than l4 ?

#6 · shalev

23 Dec 2014

What I'm wondering is whether I have a winning move on turn 37 or not. Originally, I thought I was doing well after move 35, but I'm not sure anymore. What do you think?

#9 · Bill LeBoeuf

24 Dec 2014

Arek, I also didn't like 29. f5 but I thought f7 was a stronger move rather than d9

#10 · shalev

24 Dec 2014

I thought move 35. e10 was pretty good - I still think that move probably wins, and that any other move on turn 35 probably loses. I'm less confident in move 29 - your suggestions are interesting.

#11 · Bill LeBoeuf

25 Dec 2014

So if 35.e10 is winning, what is your improvement?

#12 · shalev

26 Dec 2014

I think just 37. j6 has a decent chance of winning there (I'm not 100% sure though). How do you beat 37. j6? link to trmph

#14 · shalev

26 Dec 2014

Bill: 39. i8 seems fine, for example this

#16 · shalev

26 Dec 2014

Arek, why not 39. i8? That seems to win really easily - what am I missing?

#17 · Arek Kulczycki

27 Dec 2014

true, dunno why I discarded it...

You're right, black win at 37 j6.

#19 · shalev

28 Dec 2014

Maciej, have you considered 39. h8? What's your next move? 40. h9 and 40. i7 both seem losing to me.

#23 · Maciej Celuch

29 Dec 2014

#24 · shalev

29 Dec 2014

Try this. The idea is that if the i8 piece is connected to the h7 piece instead of the j10 group, black wins. But if the i8 piece connects to the j10 group instead of the h7 piece, white wins. So black needs to prevent that connection at all costs - hence 47.h9 in this line.

#25 · Arek Kulczycki

29 Dec 2014

Heh, interesting, that seemed to me a simple position and I keep getting it wrong :) That is a good sympthon though, that on top level we still make plenty of errors, so there is much room to improve :)