Public forum discussion.
1 Mar 2014
Hi there!
I'm cataloging a lot of edge templates I've found by seeing them a lot of times in my games, and by reviewing games by strong players and play a kind of "next move" game ;) Some of them are to be found in David King's page.
My question is, what do you think about naming them? I don't really like the naming in Browne's book (also used in hexwiki), but what's the popular thought about that naming policy?
1 Mar 2014
2 Mar 2014
2 Mar 2014
I'm still shocked for that winning for White. And still haven't found the answer. THAT is a cool problem :D
Thanks a lot, Shalev. And please, people, don't spoil the fun ;) I'm still trying, hehehehe (that was not meant for you, Arek.... as long as it's link, I'm free to click on them or not, hehe)
2 Mar 2014
Gregorio, Arek's link isn't related to my puzzle. He's just giving an example of a very strange escape.
Arek, that's really cool! I cleaned up the escape to turn it into a puzzle: Black to move and win.
2 Mar 2014
ah, ok! great! Now I have two puzzles! :D
3 Mar 2014
By the way, this is why the first pattern I mentioned doesn't generalize (white wins in this position).
3 Mar 2014
Hum no after 35.g4 I can't find a continuation.
3 Mar 2014
3 Mar 2014
Hahaha, Marius, that's awesome! I never realized this. I guess my template is wrong!
3 Mar 2014
yeah, that's why I said "forget about it", hehehe
3 Mar 2014
Carroll, e2 is not the intended first move. It might still work, I didn't check, but there's a much simpler solution. Here's the intended solution: SPOILER
3 Mar 2014
Yes clever, would you say the mediatrice is usually a good way to join two segments?
4 Mar 2014
Good, Shalev, I really didn't find a defence against those moves - glad you agree there were none! :-)
The template works if you reduce the size of the board with one row, though. Then my suggested attack falls just short of connecting, I think.